Teacher Collaborations: What Works and What Doesn’t
December 1997-January 1998
What qualities do you see as being essential to effective, ongoing collaborations? Can
you describe some "successful" collaborations in which you’ve taken part? Some
unsuccessful collaborations? What sorts of supports need to be put in place in order for
authentic collaborations to be initiated and sustained?
--Sanda Balaban
I’m in a dysfunctional team (English, Math, Social Studies, Science, and
reading specialists, 7th grade, inner city school in Newburgh). Nobody
sees a duty to discuss kids together regularly, doesn’t want to stay
afterschool (we aren’t given a prep period to meet together so we have to
do it afterschool, in conflict with other meetings and things so we don’t
meet regularly). I have a strong connection with my social studies
teammate because I like him and because his classroom is very near mine;
I don’t care for the other two and it’s mutual. The principal yells at
us once in a while but without a shared prep period and with a culture
(maintained by the team leader, a young teacher) of "do the minimum and
get by; principals are full of crap" there’s not much that can be
accomplished.
The "functional" team seems to be very productive and have a lot of
satisfaction working together. I guess since schools are made up of all
sorts of folks, there will be functional and dysfunctional teams; and
until periods of time (with occasional supervision by facilitators) are
available for dysfunctional teams to be given support and stimulation to
work out their issues, they will continue to exist.
The real issue, seems to me, is where the principal is at in all this.
If he focuses on parents as clients, kids as factory fodder and teachers
as airline stewardesses, he’s not going to encourage teaming. The overall
school culture needs apt leadership to attain a degree of collaborative
professionalism that supports the work needed for dysfunctional teams to
heal themselves. And even then, the dead teachers will have to end up in
some sort of "morgue team" someplace.
To summarize: some teams will just run well because everyone likes each
other and likes working together; for the rest, however, supports to work
through issues and function as a team include: a set time for teams to
meet, available facilitators, clear guidelines on responsibilities (and empowerment to support that) from the principal.
That’s my opinion after
a half-year of teaching in public school.
--Bram Moreinis
Time, leadership, a supportive school culture (and colleagues)--yes, yes,
yes, in an ideal arrangement. But what if such supports do not exist? What
sorts of ways of "circumventing the system" have you created (or heard or
read about) to start and sustain collaborations in the absence of external
(and’or administrative) supports?
--Sanda Balaban
Start small, build up from a successful working base.
I have always tried to find at least one colleague who is on my wavelength.
If I can’t have a successful collaboration with a team, at least I can
become a role model with one other person. It is usually easier to find one
sympathetic person than a team. You can serve as support and facilitators
for each other. Having been in both a good collaboration and a weak one, I
know that in the weak ones you have to make your own smaller unit. That’s
what I am doing now.
--Benna Golubtchik
A successful collaboration needs people with a shared vision and philosophy.
A common background is not necessary.
I worked with people who had different backgrounds, approaches, and skills,
but all had the same goal and philosophy of education. Our purpose was to
write a proposal for a new mini-school. We all found the process
exhilarating, frustrating at times, and, most importantly, extremely exciting.
I grew from working with these people and learned an incredible amount. We
all brought different skills to the mix, and we all took away more than we
came with.
Contrast that to a program which has been put into place with no concern for
the educational philosophy of the participants. I have worked in an
environment where people were brought together and expected to work together
to create an educational plan, but spent the time defending their positions
because they couldn’t agree on an approach. Without the proper foundation of
common philosophy, successful collaboration is difficult, at best. Taking the
time to bring people together who share a goal (or allowing them to self-
select) is the most important aspect of successful collaboration.
--Benna Golubtchik
This year I am involved in a critical friends group (cfg) as a coach and a
member. Our ultimate goal is improving student learning by reflecting on
our own learning. It took four months of trust building before we began the
process of looking at our own work and student work. The group is small and
very tight, meaning we seek each other out between meetings for mutual
support. I know this group is doing real work because in other groups my
thoughts tend to wander on to all the task that have to completed by days
end. In this group I am so focused on what my colleagues are sharing that
the role leadership fades in and out of the session. The group, maybe
because of the size, six people, seems to be an example of shared
leadership or true democracy. I think cfg’s can be a vehicle for authentic
collaboration.
--Gwen Clinkscales
Collaborations can work when people are willing to work towards a common
vision, communicate openly with each other, and sometimes even make
compromises.
In my school, the principal invites collaborations and tries to provide time
during the school day so teachers could meet and work together. She has
turned over prep schedule planning to teachers so their input is taken into
consideration and common prep periods are scheduled if possible. Teachers who
meet after school to collaborate on projects—grade-wise or school-wise—are compensated if at all possible. Time is
always the major factor, especially during the school day, if teachers want to plan and
work together. In addition, resources are important for successful collaborations and if
the supervisor’principal can get allocations, this makes the job easier for teachers.
Open dialogue is essential. Teachers need to be open-minded, willing to share
as well as listen to others if they want to collaborate effectively. I’ve worked with teachers on
small collaborative projects and their pettiness and unwillingness to make modifications
caused stress and anger within the group. This can really divide people and sour them to
work on future collaborations.
Overall though, I’ve been lucky to have worked on great collaboration projects
with interested, caring, and visionary colleagues. They have invigorated my
own professionalism and pushed me to constantly change and learn and improve .
--Alice Hom
A brief recap on previous insights:
* The importance of TIME, leadership, and a supportive school culture (All);
* Acting locally and starting small (Benna);
* Having vision, maintaining communication, and making compromises (Alice);
* Developing a shared philosophy focused on a common goal (Benna);
* Conducting open dialogue and keeping open minds (Alice);
* Building trust, incorporating ongoing self-reflection, and working in small
groups (Gwen)
Judi posed some particularly provocative questions: Are collaborations
"easier" at an early childhood level? If so, are there certain elements of
these arrangements that we all could learn from and utilize in our
collaborations?
Judi also writes about being "steeped in the collaborative mentality since
college," citing the importance of starting collaborations at a pre-service
level and thereby inculcating the idea of authentic collegiality before even
entering the classroom. Based on your experiences with student teachers, and
your knowledge of teacher education programs, are such collaborations being
embraced within pre-service programs? How? What are the effects?
Are informal collaborations--the ones that individuals independently opt
into, in the lunchroom or the hallways--more valuable’viable than structured
ones--those imposed by the administration or department? What are some
advantages and disadvantages of each?
--Sanda Balaban
In our school, the principal (Headmaster) has initiated a teacher learning
and resource center with professional development along the lines of
"new" methodology, opportunities for collaboration, the creation of
interdisciplinary curriculum, etc. What a great concept, but so far
those who are going (it is voluntary )are the collaborator types
already. Coffee, snacks and coverage are pulling out a few more, but it
may be some time before the non-collaborators visit. I’ll keep you
posted. Who knows, the Havarti or Brie may just put them over the edge.
--Maggie Hoyt
This topic is of particular interest to me as I seem to exist in a
collaborative school. We are a team of eight teachers and five classes (two 7th grade, two eighth, and one special
ed). Our daily lives are completely intertwined (not always agreeably) because of having
such a small school, being in close proximity and
the lack of our Director to direct. Collaborations, for me, have been
both successful and unsuccessful and I truly believe that ( to quote
Alice) "Collaborations can work when people are willing to work towards a
common vision, communicate openly with each other, and sometimes even make
compromises" I don’t think that forced collaborations are successful or
that administrative leadership is critical (unless you have Alice’s
Principal). There are no time or financial allowances for collaboration in
my school. Discussions happen at the morning table, in the hall, or on the
phone. There has to be a willingness on the part of both teachers and
flexibility—so that work load differences, project direction and
unexpected difficulties do not become barriers. Collaborative partners
also have to be willing and able to support one another in terms of making
students accountable. By that I mean, students realize that the project
"counts" in both disciplines (thus , it is easier if the teachers have
similar standards). One recent collaboration, (that I wouldn’t even
consider a true collaboration) was a disaster on my end as the students had
little regard for the other teacher and they knew she would accept work
that I wouldn’t. My most successful collaborations have been with colleagues who
are willing, flexible and dedicated.
--Lexi McGill
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts on collaboration. You raise a good
point with regard to how do we move beyond "preaching to the choir" and widen
the circle of "converts" willing to invest in collaboration. Enticements alone—even the edible
kind—may not be enough. I wonder what would be? Perhaps part of the remaining
resistance springs from the preexisting culture, which may not have endorsed
collaborations to the same degree. You wisely recognize what many overlook—it takes
time to change a culture. The history of school change efforts shows us that we are often
over-hasty in wanting immediate results without allowing enough time for reform to really
take root--to stick and seep into the school culture. Keep us posted on the progress of
this. It’s great that your principal is so supportive. (And Gouda can work wonders....)
--Sanda Balaban
Lexi, you raise interesting points about the nature of collaboration at a school
specifically designed to utilize such interactions. It’s encouraging to hear that in some ways
collaborations have been arisen to fill the void left by the leadership vacuum.--inspiration
that all is not hopeless in the absence of administrative support.
The qualities you cite—willingness, dedication, flexibility, and
consistency—are key. Have you discovered ways of inculcating such buy-in
within the staff you’re working with?
I love your emphasis on "student accountability" as the bottom line—this is
both the most worthy goal and something that all parties (hopefully!) can
agree about, and which can thereby serve as an important unifier.
--Sanda Balaban
Please excuse my late jump into this conversation. Collaborations are a life
blood of my professional growth. I agree that professional collaborations
work best when they are voluntary and have a common vision and goal. Even
with a strong foundation, collaborations provide a challenge that comes from
working with different perspectives. Growth comes with continual reflection
and problem solving that includes different points of view. This is true of
both collaborative teaching and collaborative learning.
--Berta Berritz |