Redefining the Roles of Cooperating Teacher, Student Teacher, and Supervising Teacher
October-November 1997
Our next topic regards the relationships between the student teacher,
cooperating teacher, and university supervisor.
Last Saturday, the NYC group met with Michele Reich, director of field
programs, Department of Technology and Learning at New York University.
Michele is responsible for coordinating all aspects of the field based
experience of all students seeking certification N-12. In her talk she told
us that she views the student teacher as the child, the cooperating teacher
as parent, and the university supervisor as grandparent. The relationship
between the student and cooperating teacher is a more intimate one, while
the
grandparent -supervisor is more distant, she explained.
This view engendered much heated discussion among our group, first with
Michele present, and then without her. What do you think? Is her metaphor
accurate in your eyes? Do you think that all partners are equal in her
scenario? How have your experiences as a student teacher or hosting student
teachers played out in regard to this parent-child-grandparent idea?
--Judi Fenton
I think the metaphor is a bit too simple for such a complicated
relationship. Grandparents dote on grandchildren and indulge their every
whim and that certainly wasn't the case with my university supervisor when I
student taught (a very long time ago). As I remember, she observed me once
for half a period and I can/t even remember her name. I do, however,
remember the name of my incredibly wonderful cooperating teacher, who was
gifted at training new teachers. We kept a steno-type notebook; I wrote on
one side about my reflections on teaching and she responded on the other
side.
Even though it was 26 years ago, I reread the comments just last week for my
new job and she talked about transition, transition, transition. Just last
week also, I took the Skillful Teacher (Jon Saphier) Administrative Course
and one of the most important moves he talks about is transition. I do know,
though, that Rachel, the university coordinator from the George Washington
Intern Program is quite effective in mentoring student teachers. I have
eavesdropped on her counseling sessions with interns and wished every student
teacher could have the opportunity to work with her. She/s nothing like a
grandparent. She visits the school quite often and observes the interns.
--Gretchen Portwood
Well that child,parent, grandparent metaphor sent me right up the wall too.
The implication is that somehow the student needs to be taught by more
experienced folk who are "family".
I see the relationship as those three being equals with different
perspectives to bring to the experience and that ALL being valid. Each has a
viewpoint that collectively leads to a much fuller view of the issue and
education in general. To impart information to a student without considering
her/his viewpoint is to continue the already dysfunctional system.
--Sally Roderick
I think identifying the student teacher as child, teacher as parent, university as
grandparent sends the message of "top down." We/re all thinking and learning adults no
matter where we are in our careers.
--Diana Takenaga-Taga
There are certain appealing aspects to the notion of student teacher as
child, cooperating teacher as parent, and university supervisor as
grandparent. I like the familial connotations it conjures, and the passing
on of experience and knowledge to the next generation. However, I/d shade
the notion somewhat differently. Perhaps student teacher as younger sibling,
cooperating teacher as older sibling, and university supervisor as
beneficient aunt or uncle would be more appropriate, and convey less
patriarchal overtones. {Also, another complicating factor is second-career
student teachers, who are often older than their "parent"}
I do have a hesitation about using a "family model" for these professional
relationships. I don/t want to get too psychoanalytic or anything, but my
fear would be that members of the triad might look to one another to embody
expectations--either fulfilled or unfulfilled--of the corresponding members
of their own families. This could be messy to manipulate. Perhaps we/d be
wiser to utilize a "community model." After all, just as it takes a village
to raise a child, so too it takes a village to educate a student teacher.
I/m not fully clear on what roles within the village would correspond to
each member of the triad. I/ll think more about this.
Unfortunately, either of these equations is more often ideal than real--many
of my fellow student teachers here at Harvard do not feel that they are
regarded as family members or community members at their schools. More
often, they feel like "invited guests" (and occasionally, "babysitters") in a
home that is not their own, but where they will be spending significant time.
My university in fact *encourages* this understanding, cautioning us not to
wear out our welcome. University supervisors, while supportive, are in many
cases not connected to the university except through this peripheral
appointment, and thus outsiders of another sort. It makes for an odd liminal
state for all parties involved, to say nothing of the students.
--Sanda Balaban
I will very quickly dismiss the grandparent-parent-child metaphor as false.
My cooperating teacher was a basket case - she was maybe 8 years older
than me and had just broken up with a boyfriend and needed my shoulder more
for emotional support than me needing her as a role model. As I told the
NYC group last week, I spent 7 years as a substitute in Nyack prior to
teaching in NYC. It may be viewed as somewhat of a very long
apprenticeship. Many of my assignments were long term (3-4months) and one
of my best friends is the AP. I learned how to teach and work within a
school setting from the fantastic role models around me. I tended to
gravitate towards those who knew how to manage students and knew how to
teach. All of them had various styles. Whenever I had a problem with
remedial students I would go to Sulynn as she was a master of "slower"
children. Linda would help me with discipline. Esther taught me
intensity. Debbie taught me thoroughness. My cooperating teacher taught
me how to wing it - that/s all she did, and I picked up on it quickly. As
a substitute, I often had to wing it - and , in the school I presently work
in, where things schedules change ALL time, i have to wing it a lot - but
I cannot say that I/d want inexperienced, first time teachers to learn how
to wing it from their cooperating teachers. My other cooperating teacher
never wrote a lesson plan - I/m not sure she even took attendance.
However, my supervising teacher - is a super amazing person - and has
supported me through thick and thin - constructive criticism, support,
discussions, openness, etc.
--Lexi McGill
I think that her metaphor is inaccurate and does not create a better
understanding of what the relationship should be which, to me, would be the
purpose of the metaphor.
As others have said, these relationships are very complex and unique to each
individual and situation. I think that it is more important to be open to
ways in which people can connect to and help each other and realize that all
members of the partnership can and do learn from each other.
One of the highlights of working with student teachers is their wealth of
ideas and their enthusiasm for the profession which can be energizing for the
cooperating teacher. I think that Lexi brought out a good point when she
mentioned how she learned different things from different people, drawing on
each one/s strengths and areas of expertise. The university professor can
provide the theoretical and research base, however, it is only through the
actual experience of the classroom, that a student teacher will understand
the realities of what a teacher needs to know and be able to do. And by
listening to those realities, the university supervisor can learn from the
student teacher and the cooperating teacher as well. We need to remove
barriers and build bridges so this exchange of ideas can happen.
--Carol Horn
I am not so troubled by the metaphor because I think it misses the more pressing concern
which is the notion of the student teaching triad itself. As long as the triad
is seen as the primary organizing principle and the status divisions between student teacher,
cooperating classroom, and university are maintained, the generational family metaphor
seems obvious, albeit unproductive.
On the other hand, moving away from the triad may be more fruitful. I
think that what is needed is a re-conceptualization around the notion of
cohorts that builds on what we know about teams and networks. Teams of
student teachers working with teams of teachers would help to broaden the essentially narrow and unrealistic experience that is
the traditional student teaching experience. At the same time, it would provide a new
context for teachers to meet and reflect on their practice. And to be honest, I don/t really
see a clearly defined role for the university. I see the university in an adjunct role that
supports what happens in the school.
--Mark Silberberg
The roles of teams or cohorts can be tremendously powerful. Not only can teaming
transform situations where teachers do little of it, but it can also set the tone for people
entering the profession to move away from the too often troubling sense of isolation.
Perhaps in this type of model, the university can play a role by offering classes in schools
for both student teachers and cooperating teachers. These classes could be around
pressing topics central to everyone involved in the schools. Group action research could
be facilitated by a university person, or two or more university people. Their connection to
formal research to help the classroom research grow.
--Peter Dillon
First, although metaphors are very powerful things which shape the way we see and act
on the world, they are also, by and large, unconscious forces. Only rarely do we adopt
metaphors with a full consciousness of the complete range of their implications. Second,
the problem of teacher education can not really be properly examined and confronted so
long as our thinking remains constrained by the notion of the triad -- we need a
fundamental re-negotiation of these roles, with a re-centering of the teacher education
process on the school.
--Leo Casey
I think the analogy of parent, child and grandparent is not a good one because it is
hopelessly paternalistic in a situation whose main problem is that kind of relationship. I/d
like to get away from it all together. In fairness to Michele Reich she had a lot more
to say than that metaphor. She mentioned possibilities of making cooperating teachers adjunct
faculty and an interest in on site education, both ideas near and dear to our hearts.
I think we are in the process of trying to change an entire zeitgeist and we need to think in a big
picture to know where we want to go with each of the nested parts.
First, we are about professionalizing the teacher community. This includes both the
people who are currently in the field and those who will enter. I believe that means we
want to create teachers/educators who are research practitioners. People capable of
generating research, consuming it and teaching it as well as being in class teachers of
children. I would like to see the whole undergraduate and grad process operate in a way
that would prepare newcomers to do that. So that at some point they would perhaps
teach on and off in the school and at the university as full time faculty in both institutions,
that they would gather research at the school level and present it at the university.
Hopefully, this would help to remove the separation of these two institutions, and gain
equity for the professionals in the schools. Clearly, we are a long way from this ideal goal.
So in the meantime we need to begin to take small steps to move in the right direction.
We need to begin to involve the present faculty of the university and the teacher corps in
each other/s cultures. A good way to begin is to create adjunct
positions for cooperating teachers hopefully with the understanding that
is not just a crumb, but a first step to integration.
Second, any mechanism that would get more full time faculty into the physical plant of real
working schools would be a good step. It could be in the form
of cooperative teaching of student teachers on sight with the cooperating teacher as co-instructor, involved in
planning, instruction and evaluation on an ongoing basis, or the creation of more
PDL/s or the provision of class space in schools for faculty to conduct on site classes.
A second area( in addition to mixing cultures) which I think is a necessary temporary or
initiating step is to begin to raise the level of acceptance of the "school teacher". Two
sides exist (at least) to this. One is to raise the actual competence in areas of research
and university level teaching. The other is to begin to change the perception and
conception of these individuals. Part of this is PR work and part is the use of strong
symbols like actual payment for their service, recognition of the importance of their
contribution to the student by creation of time blocks in which they can plan with the
university personnel and student and other forms of symbolic recognition. Finally, (for
now) I would like to suggest that education of student teachers is not something we do to
them, but a process in which all three of us--student, cooperating teacher and university
teacher work on together. If we expect students to develop as teachers we must believe
they are learners who take responsibility for creating themselves and can participate as
equal members of a team helping them to define themselves. This is not rhetoric, but
represents a strong commitment to autonomy.
I think we need to see the big picture. I/m sure the picture is bigger than I have
suggested, but maybe we can begin to build it together.
--Joe Rafter
In defense of Michele, I/d like to add that in her recognition that the
cooperating teacher plays an important and intimate role in the education of
student teachers, she is eons beyond many of the university professors and
supervisors I interviewed for my policy paper. (And those that I/ve worked
with). At least she believes that the primary relationship in the triad is
that of the cooperating teacher and student teacher, and therefore, she
values that connection. Many that I interviewed view the cooperating teacher
as a necessary interference in educating new teachers.
I agree with many of your criticisms of her metaphor, especially about the
need for equality in the triad and that all members learn from each other
(although I strongly disagree with Mark about the unnecessary role of the
university), I wonder if we are digging rather too deeply and perhaps she was
commenting on the nature of how the relationships play out between the
members of the triad.
What do you think?
--Judi Fenton
As long as Judy is disagreeing with me, I/ll disagree with myself (which
I assume qualifies as continuing the conversation). I think my initial
objection to the university role hinged on the ability of the university
to rethink itself. Given Judy/s comments concerning university
practitioners and school practitioners there is a tremendous gap in
perception (one that Joe rightly points out can only be overcome by a
shared culture). I think universities are going to have an incredibly
hard time changing which is why I would advocate for school-based
teacher education. However, if the university is willing to engage in
the kind of action research that Peter mentions this would be
significant. At the same time, the university cannot simply teach
action research skills. It needs to become part of the life of the
public school. More important is the direct link between action
research and policy. If the academy gets its hands dirty in the life of
public schools as opposed to analyzing large sets of data, there are
profound implications for the impact this could have on policy. The
question then is how to finesse universities into this relationship.
Maybe we need to involve more university-based educators in this
conversation. So I stand corrected.
--Mark Silberberg
As for the metaphor, I believe that Michelle/s analogy is typical. Most
universities do distant themselves from the schools. My student teaching
experience was adequate. I was fortunate to have two fine cooperating
teachers who set good examples for me to follow. Since my student teaching
classroom experiences worked out, my university supervisor only made one
visit per student teaching assignment. So she visited me twice during the
entire school year. Was this enough or adequate? It was adequate, but
hardly enough. Once I entered the NYC public school system, I was placed
into a win-lose situation. Classroom management skills were helpful from
my student teaching days and kept me afloat with 41 students on my first
day on the job. After fifteen years in the classroom, I think I came out a
winner.
I have to agree with Mark/s last point regarding the reality of the
university/s role in schools. It will take time to get schools of
education to re-think and re-invent their role in public schools. So what
do we need to do? I believe we need to build relationships with
universities. Instead of waiting for the university to call on us, we need
to establish ground rules. The current role allows the university to come
in and out of the teaching/learning environment with no other connection.
Perhaps schools should require universities to play an active role in the
teaching community for an extended period of time or limit student teaching
opportunities at school sites.
--Peggy Wyns-Madison
I/m glad my disagreement fueled your rethinking, and I agree with you now.
The university certainly must reinvent itself in regard to teacher ed. For
the most part they are not adequately preparing or supporting new teachers to
take on the realities of teaching. Certainly, any situation that encourages
dialogue and interaction between actual teachers and teacher educators (as
well as teacher education students, of course) will help to frame the reinvention.
I think it would be interesting and productive to invite teacher educators
to join our conversations. Any other feedback on that idea?
--Judi Fenton
I finally had to add my two cents. Everything Sally has written seems on
target to me. The metaphor was a perfect model for a dysfunctional family all right! If the relationship is not
a collaborative one with the roles and contributions of all partners understood, we will
always get what we/ve always got. We all know we can/t afford that!
--Tina Yalen |