|
Levels of Performance |
Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1.
Organization and Clarity:
|
Most
viewpoints and responses are not clearly outlined or orderly. |
Some
viewpoints and responses are clearly outlined and orderly. |
Most
viewpoints and responses are clearly outlined and orderly. Grabs
attention. |
All
viewpoints and responses are clearly outlined and orderly.
Electrifies and convinces audience. |
2. Use of
Arguments:
. |
Few or
irrelevant reasons are given to support the viewpoint. |
Some relevant
reasons are given to support the viewpoint. |
Most reasons
given to support the viewpoint are relevant. |
All reasons
given to support the viewpoint are relevant. |
3. Use of
Examples and Facts:
|
Lack of
relevant examples and facts to support reasons for viewpoint. |
Few relevant
examples/facts are given to support reasons for viewpoint. |
Most
examples/facts given to support reasons for viewpoint are
relevant. |
All
supporting examples and facts given to support reasons for
viewpoint are relevant. |
4. Use of
Rebuttal:
|
No effective
counter-arguments are made to respond to arguments by other teams. |
Few effective
counter-arguments are made to respond to arguments by other
teams. |
Some
effective counter-arguments are made to respond to arguments made
by other teams. |
Effective
counter-arguments are made to respond to arguments made by other
teams. |
5.
Presentation Style:
|
Tone of
voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are not used to
convince the audience. |
Tone of
voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are sometimes used
to convince the audience. |
Most tones of
voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm is convincing to
the audience. |
Tone of
voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm is used
effectively to convince the audience. |
6.
Teamwork |
Arguments were overlapping, repetitive, or
contradictory.
Many members did not participate. |
Each member presented a different argument,
with minimal overlap and repetition.
|
Each member presented different but
complementary arguments.
|
Each member presented an argument that built
on the arguments of those that came earlier.
|