|
95-100% of words on the map are spelled and capitalized correctly.
|
94-85% of the words on the map are spelled and capitalized correctly.
|
84-75% of the words on the map are spelled and capitalized correctly.
|
Less than 75% of the words on the map are spelled and/or capitalized
correctly.
|
|
When shown a blank base map, the student can rapidly and accurately label
at least 10 features.
|
When shown a blank base map, the student can rapidly and accurately label
8-9 features.
|
When shown a blank base map, the student can rapidly and accurately label
6-7 features.
|
When shown a blank base map, the student can rapidly and accurately label
fewer than 6 features.
|
|
At least 90% of the items are labeled and located correctly.
|
80-89% of the items are labeled and located correctly.
|
79-70% of the items are labeled and located correctly.
|
Less than 70% of the items are labeled and located correctly.
|
|
Title tells the purpose/content of the map, is clearly distinguishable as
the title (e.g. larger letters, underlined, etc), and is printed at the
top of the map.
|
Title tells the purpose/content of the map and is printed at the top of
the map.
|
Title tells the purpose/content of the map, but is not located at the top
of the map.
|
Purpose/content of the map is not clear from the title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All units are described (in a key or with labels) and are appropriately
sized for the data set.
|
Most units are described (in a key or with labels) and are appropriately
sized for the data set.
|
All units are described (in a key or with labels) but are not
appropriately sized for the data set.
|
Units are neither described NOR appropriately sized for the data set.
|
|
Exceptionally well designed, neat, and attractive. Colors that go well
together are used to make the graph more readable. A ruler and graph paper
(or graphing computer program) are used.
|
Neat and relatively attractive. A ruler and graph paper (or graphing
computer program) are used to make the graph more readable.
|
Lines are neatly drawn but the graph appears quite plain.
|
Appears messy and "thrown together" in a hurry. Lines are visibly crooked.
|
|
All points are plotted correctly and are easy to see. A ruler is used to
neatly connect the points or make the bars, if not using a computerized
graphing program.
|
All points are plotted correctly and are easy to see.
|
All points are plotted correctly.
|
Points are not plotted correctly OR extra points were included.
|
|
Data in the table is well organized, accurate, and easy to read.
|
Data in the table is organized, accurate, and easy to read.
|
Data in the table is accurate and easy to read.
|
Data in the table is not accurate and/or cannot be read.
|
|
Title is creative and clearly relates to the problem being graphed
(includes dependent and independent variable). It is printed at the top of
the graph.
|
Title clearly relates to the problem being graphed (includes dependent and
independent variable) and is printed at the top of the graph.
|
A title is present at the top of the graph.
|
A title is not present.
|
|
The X axis has a clear, neat label that describes the units used for the
independent variable (e.g, days, months, participants' names).
|
The X axis has a clear label that describes the units used for the
independent variable.
|
The X axis has a label.
|
The X axis is not labeled.
|
|
The Y axis has a clear, neat label that describes the units and the
dependent variable (e.g, % of dogfood eaten; degree of satisfaction).
|
The Y axis has a clear label that describes the units and the dependent
variable (e.g, % of dogfood eaten; degree of satisfaction).
|
The Y axis has a label.
|
The Y axis is not labeled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All buttons and links work correctly.
|
Most (99-90%) buttons and links work correctly
|
Many (89-75%) of the buttons and links work correctly.
|
Fewer than 75% of the buttons work correctly.
|
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of
background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the
topic.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of
background is consistent from card to card.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics.
|
Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics
on the page.
|
|
Graphics are hand-drawn. The illustrator(s) are given credit somewhere in
the presentation.
|
A combination of hand-drawn and HyperStudio graphics are used. Sources are
documented in the presentation for all images.
|
Some graphics are from sources that clearly state that non-commercial use
is allowed without written permission. Sources are documented in the
presentation for all "borrowed" images.
|
Some graphics are borrowed from sites that do not have copyright
statements or do not state that non-commericial use is allowed, OR sources
are not documented for all images.
|
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to
enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formating has been carefully planned to complement the content. It
may be a little hard to read.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
|
|
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual
errors.
|
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that
might be inaccurate.
|
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly
flawed or inaccurate.
|
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate
the type of material that might be on the next card.
|
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of
information seems out of place.
|
Some information is logically sequenced. An occassional card or item of
information seems out of place.
|
There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
|
|
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the
theme/content of the presentation.
|
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the
presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the
theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the
presentation.
|
|
Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding
of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
|
Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding
of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate
study guide.
|
Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete
study guide.
|
Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it
a poor study guide.
|