Rubric For the Product Presentation
Exceptional (4) | Admirable(3) | Acceptable(2) | Amateur(1) | |
Organization | Extremely well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project |
Presented in a thoughtful manner; there were signs of organization and most transitions were easy to follow, but at times ideas were unclear | Somewhat organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted the audience | Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow; transitions of ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the audience |
Content Accuracy | Completely accurate; all facts were precise and explicit | Mostly accurate; a few inconsistencies or errors in information | Somewhat accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information | Completely inaccurate; the facts in this project were misleading to the audience |
Research | Went above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance project; | Did a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full potential; solicited more than six types of research to enhance project; at times took the initiative to find information outside of school | Used the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any additional resources | Did not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the topic |
Creativity | Was extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly enhanced the project | Was clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented |
Added a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate it throughout | Little creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked "zip" |
Presentation Mechanics | Was engaging, provocative, and captured the interest of the audience and maintained this throughout the entire presentation; great variety of visual aids and multimedia; visual aids were colorful and clear | Was well done and interesting to the audience; was presented in a unique manner and was very well organized; some use of visual aids | Was at times interesting and was presented clearly and precisely; was clever at times and was organized in a logical manner; limited variety of visual aids and visual aids were not colorful or clear | Was not organized effectively; was not easy to follow and did not keep the audience interested; no use of visual aids |
Speaking | Support for conclusions were clearly explained and in an engaging manner. Adds illustrations, examples as needed to support conclusions. | Support for conclusions were explained and might have been engaging.. Adds some illustrations or examples to support conclusions. | Support for conclusions were not clearly explained.. Little or no illustrations or examples were used to support conclusions. | Support for conclusions were not explained.. Little or no illustrations or examples were used to support conclusions. |
Graphics, Sound and/or Animation |
The graphics, sound and/or animation assist in presenting an overall theme and make visual connections that enhance understanding of concept, ideas and relationships. | The graphics, sound/and or animation visually depict material and assist the audience in understanding the flow of information or content. | Some of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations seem unrelated to the topic/theme and do not enhance the overall concepts. | The graphics, sounds, and/or animations are unrelated to the content. |