Evaluation
Performance on this webquest will be
evaluated in 4 areas: (1) Historical Accuracy of the research gathered, (2)
Parallel Comparison of the Habsburg dynastic rule to a current day model(3)
Structural Quality of work, including grammar and spelling (4) Clarity and Emotional Appeal of
Writing. Participants will work
individually as they research the parts of the topic, but the final products
will be judged as a group.
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Factual / Historical
Accuracy
|
One or
more generalized and somewhat unreliable source |
Two
credible sources and additional sources of a questionable
nature. |
Three
credible sources identified and related to topic.
|
Four or
more credible sources used with significant materials clearly identified
and used. |
|
|
Parallelism: Quality of the
Comparison
|
The model
is interesting, but unrelated to Habsburg dynastic
rule. |
The model
bears some resemblance to Habsburg rule. |
The model
shows numerous similarities. |
Direct
correlation is evident and the model shows obvious
parallels. |
|
|
Structural Quality including
Spelling & Grammar
|
Description is difficult to
read because of organization and spelling and grammar
errors. |
Narrative
lacks organization but is grammatically correct with few spelling
errors. |
Narrative
is organized well, but has a few grammatical or spelling errors.
|
Written
material is well organized and grammatically correct with no spelling
errors. |
|
|
Clarity and Emotional Appeal
of Writing
|
Narrative
is loose and difficult to follow. |
Ideas and
conclusions are apparent, but without logical
connections. |
Ideas are
well presented, but lack some logical flow to conclusions.
|
Idea flow
logically from one concept to another. Conclusions are easily reached and
appealing to reader |
|